<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Wordpress Microsites - Automotive Microsites&#187; toyota domain name</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.seomicrosites.com/category/toyota-domain-name/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.seomicrosites.com</link>
	<description>Pasch Consulting Group</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:09:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Toyota Tells Dealers To Stop Using Microsites</title>
		<link>http://www.seomicrosites.com/20100109-toyota-tells-dealers-to-stop-using-microsites/</link>
		<comments>http://www.seomicrosites.com/20100109-toyota-tells-dealers-to-stop-using-microsites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 03:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[toyota dealers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toyota domain name]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[domain restrictions for Toyota]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toyota dealer domain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toyota dealer websites]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[toyota websites]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.seomicrosites.com/?p=425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to highly trusted sources,Toyota dealers will be getting a letter in the mail very soon.  These letters will vary but different versions will say: Toyota is telling their dealers that they should only have ONE website. Toyota believes that dealers should not operate microsites to drive in their own first party leads. Toyota does [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>According to highly trusted sources,Toyota dealers will be getting a letter in the mail very soon.  These letters will vary but different versions will say:</p>
<ul>
<li>Toyota is telling their dealers that they should only have ONE website.</li>
<li>Toyota believes that dealers should not operate microsites to drive in their own first party leads.</li>
<li>Toyota does not believe that dealers should have their own outside blogs.</li>
<li>Dealer must surrender domains to Toyota that include the word &#8220;Toyota&#8221; outside of their primary domain.</li>
</ul>
<p>It would seem that Toyota would like to force dealers to purchase leads at $20 a pop from third party resellers.  Their actions seem to encourage dealer dependency on Cars.com and Autotrader.com for listing their car inventory instead of on their own localized microsites.</p>
<p>Microsites would have allowed them to create their own regional car listing portals and to collect more first party leads.</p>
<p>So much for thinking that Toyota understands Internet Marketing and Web 2.0.</p>
<h2>Toyota Crackdown</h2>
<p>If you are a Toyota dealer that operate microsites on multiple domains or landing pages that include the word &#8220;Toyota&#8221; you will be asked to remove your content and hand over the domain ownership to Toyota immediately.</p>
<p>This popped up when we tried to run a Google Adwords campaign to a dealer microsite that had the word Toyota in the URL name.  Google blocked the ad because it was not a registered dealer domain name.  It appears  that Toyota gave Google a list of approved primary dealer domains and locked down anyone using Toyota in the domain that was not a primary dealer.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ffff00;"><strong>Sub-domains are OK for now</strong></span></p>
<p>This crackdown will reduce Toyota dealers to having <span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong>one website</strong></span> with the option of having multiple sub-domains.  Blogs hosted outside the dealer&#8217;s primary domain will be forced to be taken down.</p>
<p>A sub-domain example is <span style="color: #ff9900;"><strong>http://service.woburntoyota.com</strong></span> and dealers can create as many sub-domains as they want. They will <strong>not</strong> be able to create a website at <span style="color: #ff9900;"><strong>www.toyotaservicewoburn.com <span style="color: #ffffff;">or</span></strong><strong> www.bostontoyotaservice.com</strong></span>. It is not clear if the sub-domain names will be limited in terms of city names that can be used.</p>
<p>Regardless of Toyota&#8217;s motives or an attempt to keep the &#8220;brand&#8221; consistent and to limit the use of their &#8220;mark&#8221; in domain names, dealers will be hurt in many ways. Dealers will have no choice but to forfeit all non-primary domains.</p>
<p>Since Toyota dealers will be knocked out of the box for their current web marketing investments, I will also talk about third party companies  and private individuals that own domains that include the word &#8220;Toyota&#8221;.</p>
<p>I will also discuss what alternatives dealers have for replacement Internet Marketing strategies.</p>
<blockquote><p><span style="color: #ff0000;"><strong><em>While Toyota dealers can take out TV, radio and print advertising that crosses official PMA lines, this move by Toyota is not about protecting dealer &#8216;s primary market areas </em>.</strong></span></p></blockquote>
<p>If it&#8217;s a move to cut down on third party lead collector&#8217;s that will also fail because of sub-domains.   Just type into Google &#8220;Toyota Cars&#8221; and you&#8217;ll see some of the largest lead collectors on Page One.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ffff00;"><strong><em>Lead Collectors will Smile</em></strong></span></p>
<p>This crackdown will be welcome news for third party lead collectors and automotive listing websites that have been blocked from Google Page One from multiple dealer owned microsites. Many companies will be popping champagne when they will have easier access to get on Google Page One since dealers will not be able to own multiple versions of their own domain names.</p>
<p>Toyota&#8217;s decision to limit their dealers to one domain for their branded marketing will impact their ability to compete; dealers in larger cities where franchises are close together will be hurt even more.</p>
<p>Toyota could be planning on taking domains like<span style="color: #ff9900;"> <strong>www.chicagotoyota.com</strong></span> from individual dealers and turning it into a local lead generation website for their dealers, but that will have to be seen. For now, they will force all dealers to forfeit their domains to Toyota and then go after third parties.</p>
<p>If a third party takes down the domain and just parks it or converts it into a consumer blog with no money making purpose, Toyota may not be able to recover these domain names because they will fail the three basic <a href="#WipoToyotaCriteria">criteria listed by the WIPO</a>, shown later in this article.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ffff00;"><strong>Some Third Party Lead Collectors Will Be Shutdown</strong></span></p>
<p>Their decision will also affect smaller lead collection companies that have purchased domains like:</p>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #ff9900;">http://www.toyotacarsforsale.com</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #ff9900;">http://www.toyotatrucksbonusbucks.com</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #ff9900;">http://www.toyota-camry.com</span></li>
</ul>
<p>Some of these websites are secretly operated by Toyota dealers and others are just selling the leads to resellers. Both will be impacted by this crackdown.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ffff00;"><strong>Are User Forums in Jeopardy? </strong></span></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if Toyota plans to go after popular user group forums that generate revenue from ads sales and Google Adwords like:</p>
<ul>
<li><span style="color: #ff9900;">http://www.toyotanation.com</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #ff9900;">http://www.toyotaforums.net/</span></li>
<li><span style="color: #ff9900;">http://www.toyota-4runner.org/</span></li>
</ul>
<p>As you read the rules set by the WIPO a sticking point for these sites are that they are generating revenue off the Toyota name and that may give Toyota a case against them.  Forum owners will say that this is freedom of speech but the WIPO might use their advertising revenue against them.</p>
<p>If Toyota chooses to leave forum websites up, they may be creating a double standard for dealer and third party compliance.</p>
<p>Let me say that I do not believe that these Toyota forum sites confuse the public, but that is not the standard that Toyota appears to be using. If dealer brand microsites are being taken down that are clearly marked as a local dealer and not corporate, then a larger agenda is at play.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ffff00;"><strong>WIPO Official Rules Pertaining to Domain Names</strong></span></p>
<p>The official rules regarding domain names that include a trademarked word like &#8220;Toyota&#8221; are not cut and dry. I have tried to simplify my interpretation but here is the official wording from the governing body pertaining to domain disputes.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(i) the domain name registered by the Respondent is identical or confusingly similar to a trademark or service mark in which the Complainant has rights; and</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(ii) the Respondent has no rights or legitimate interests in respect of the domain name in question; and</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">(iii) the domain name has been registered and is being used in bad faith.</p>
<p>If a non-Toyota dealer, like an independent used car dealer, who operates a website like <span style="color: #ff9900;"><strong>www.bostonusedtoyotacars.com</strong></span>, that provides information on Toyota cars and the website doesn&#8217;t look like a Toyota branded site, do they violate all three of the guidelines above? Would any consumer think this is the corporate Toyota site?  I do not think so.  Since the used car store can legally sell Toyota used cars in Boston, did the owner purchase the domain in bad faith?  I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ffff00;"><strong>Examples of Other Domain Disputes</strong></span></p>
<p>There are a number of cases where upset consumers have created a website to express their dissatisfaction with a company or person. The domain they posted content on included a trademarked, incorporated or individual&#8217;s name.</p>
<p>In recent news was a case filed by Fox TV anchor Glen Beck against the owner of the domain:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Glenn Beck Domain Dispute Case" href="http://www.glennbeckrapedandmurderedayounggirlin1990.com " target="_blank">www.glennbeckrapedandmurderedayounggirlin1990.com </a></p>
<p>The WIPO (<a href="http://www.wipo.int/">http://www.wipo.int</a>) dismissed Beck&#8217;s claim, you can read this blog post: <a href="http://www.npr.org/blogs/alltechconsidered/2009/11/glenn_beck_loses_domain_name_d.html">Glen Beck Dispute</a></p>
<p><span style="color: #ffff00;"><strong>What May Be Safe<br />
</strong></span></p>
<p>When challenged in domain name disputes, some individuals were victorious based on a few conditions and freedom of speech laws. If we applied past WIPO domain dispute decisions to Toyota&#8217;s current efforts to collect many Toyota domains in use, they would most likely lose in all cases where:</p>
<ol>
<li>The site did not      confuse the consumer in thinking that they are on a Toyota Corporate website.
<ol>
<li>Shouldn&#8217;t copy       the layout of Toyota.com or related properties</li>
<li>Shouldn&#8217;t       attempt to make visitors think they are on a Toyota site</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>It should not      contain the Toyota logo.</li>
<li>It clearly      identifies itself as an independent website.</li>
<li>The site should      not be created to divert customers from the primary trademark holder.
<ol>
<li>Examples:       <span style="color: #800000;"><span style="color: #ff9900;">Toyota.net</span> </span>or <span style="color: #ff9900;">ToyotaCorp.com</span> could not be used</li>
</ol>
</li>
<li>It is not for      profit and informational in nature.</li>
</ol>
<p>I&#8217;m not pretending to provide legal advice here, so you can read the rules yourself or hire an attorney for legal advice if you want to fight the letter that will soon arrive at your door.</p>
<p>From my interpretation of past cases from the WIPO, creating a blog at <span style="color: #ff9900;"><strong>www.toyotacartalk.com</strong></span> and allowing consumers to express their opinions would be allowed by teh WIPO. Toyota would most likely lose a case if they wanted to take down a blog with this name as long as it is not making money or using the Toyota logo.  It is a matter of freedom of speech.</p>
<p><span style="color: #ffff00;"><strong>Case in Point: Freedom of Speech</strong></span></p>
<p>A famous freedom of speech case was over a Web site <a title="Chelwest Domain Name Dispute" href="http://www.chelwest.com" target="_blank">www.chelwest.com</a>, operated by Frank Redmond, which expresses inflammatory opinions about a public hospital &#8212; Chelsea and Westminster in London. Redmond was not happy with the hospital&#8217;s treatment of his daughter.</p>
<p>The hospital claimed that the site&#8217;s name is too similar to its own site, and that &#8220;Chelwest&#8221; is part of the hospital&#8217;s branding and therefore its intellectual property.</p>
<p>The hospital&#8217;s Web site is www.chelwest.nhs.uk.</p>
<p>The single person panel ruled in favor of Redmond. The reasons were: Redmond is not using the site for any commercial gain and it is immediately apparent to Internet users who visit the site that it is not the official site; Redmond, according to the panel is simply criticizing the hospital with opinions which he believes to be true; it is not obvious that Chelwest is branding of the hospital.</p>
<p>This case is interesting because the panelist deciding the case had tried to draw up a set of criteria that could be used to judge whether a freedom of speech site should be permissible or not.</p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><span style="color: #ffff00;"><strong>What CAN Toyota Dealers Do?</strong></span></p>
<p>From what I have been told Toyota dealers can NOT create blogs or marketing websites outside of their primary domain.  If you have a free VOX, WordPress or NING community website that will have to be taken down.   If Toyota dealers scream loud enough that might change but for now dealers will buckle because Toyota holds the purse strings.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #ffcc00;">So could Miller Toyota create a website called &#8220;www.ilovemillercars.com&#8221;?  <span style="color: #ff0000;"> </span></span></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #ffcc00;"><span style="color: #ff0000;">From what I know, the answer is No</span></span></p>
<p><strong>What Toyota dealers can do</strong> is push their inventory out to highly optimized local website properties that do not contain Toyota in the domain name but in the sub-domain. There are a number of related solutions that will allow Toyota dealers to post their cars, stories and sales on third party websites that have high rankings.</p>
<p>Any Toyota dealer that needs help, can call or ask questions on this forum.</p>
<p>Before Toyota started this crack down, it was clearly cheaper for Toyota dealers to own their own marketing microsites, but now Toyota will increase their advertising spending costs several fold.</p>
<h3><strong>PCG Has Dealer Alternatives<br />
</strong></h3>
<p>The ruling will be good for PCG because we have many automotive domain names that do not include Toyota in the URL that we can optimize for local Toyota dealers.  We will move any microsite content with the now prohibited domains to their primary websites.  We also have a few new strategies that will be compliant so no Toyota dealer will be left behind.</p>
<p>Since we will only work for <span style="color: #ffff00;">one Toyota dealer</span> in a marketing region, those that act quickly will have a solution that can be implemented quickly.</p>
<p>In the end, it&#8217;s bad for Toyota dealers and will be a costly decision to limit free market thinking on the Internet.  As I stated before. Toyota dealers can take out TV, radio and print advertising that crosses official PMA lines so this is not about protecting dealer franchise marketing.</p>
<p>Again, this is good for some businesses but NOT local Toyota dealers who were smart enough to be entrepreneurial in their Internet Marketing plans.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll have more to report as this story unfolds&#8230;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><span style="color: #ff0000;"><em>This blog post is not intended to give any legal advice.  If you are involved in a domain dispute, contact your lawyer or a domain litigation attorney.</em></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.seomicrosites.com/20100109-toyota-tells-dealers-to-stop-using-microsites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
